Kruger, D., & Zechmeister, E. (1999, August). A skills-experience inventory for undergraduate psychology majors. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston.

Daniel J. Kruger& Eugene B. Zechmeister
Department of Psychology
Loyola University Chicago
6525 N. Sheridan Rd.
Chicago, IL 60626

Introduction

College students may only have vague notions about how an undergraduate degree in psychology will help them in future careers. By focusing on their knowledge of theories in psychology, students may not be cognizant of skills acquired during their undergraduate education. This set of skills includes thinking skills, language skills, information gathering and synthesis skills, research methods and statistical skills (see, for example, McGovern et al., 1991). Although these skills are varied and distinctive, they have been elusive to a specific delineation and measurement (Hays, 1996). A skills inventory was created with the goals of giving feedback to individual students on their development of skills through the completion of the psychology major, and documenting the nature of skill acquisition by psychology majors (see Hays, 1996). Feedback to individual students would provide an assessment of their progress in skill areas related to career goals and enable them to better market themselves to employers.

Method

Unique skills were compiled from the literature and from consultation with psychology faculty. Ten skill areas were developed based on this compilation (see Table 1). An inventory was developed with 90 items, 9 for each skill area.These items were based in concrete experiences where students exercised a particular skill. Senior and freshmen psychology majors (N=102) completed the inventory and a Multivariate Analysis of Variance compared the differences between groups on the skill areas.

Results

The MANOVA found a significant overall effect for experience in the psychology program, and statistically significant differences in 7 of the 10 skill areas (see Table 2 and Table 3). The largest effect was for Research Methods, then for Information Gathering, Ethics/Values, and Critical Thinking. There was not a statistically significant difference for Groups/Organizations, Behavior Management or Individual Differences.

Discussion

This inventory may provide valuable feedback to students and faculty about the skills developed through their Psychology program. The finding that senior psychology majors scored significantly higher on many of the skill areas than did freshmen helps validate the usefulness of this instrument. This instrument is a step towards the measurement of the distinctive but elusive skills instilled in psychology majors.

References

Hays, N. (1996). What makes a psychology graduate distinctive? European Psychologist, 1, 130-134.

McGovern, T., Furumoto, L., Halpern, D., Kimple, G., and McKeachie, W. (1991). Liberal education, study in depth, and the arts and sciences major- Psychology. American Psychologist, 46, 598-605.

Table 1

Ten General Areas of Academic Skills
Skill Area
Description
1. Written/Oral CommunicationThe ability to convey information effectively in both written and oral communication.
2. Information GatheringThe ability to obtain relevant information from publications, databases and other appropriate sources.
3. Groups/Organizations/CommunityThe ability to work effectively in teams and with groups of other people.
4. Interpersonal/Counseling/Interviewing/MentoringThe ability to effectively conduct one-on-one interactions, including counseling, interviewing and administering standardized tests.
5. Behavior Management/Supervision/TeachingThe ability to teach, supervise and manage behavior through personal skills and by monitoring and manipulating relevant aspects of the immediate environment.
6. Individual differences/Special populations/Cultural diversityThe ability to work with individuals from special populations and diverse cultures in a sensitive and effective manner.
7. Critical thinking/Problem solvingThe ability to critically evaluate situations and projects in a rational manner and reach conclusions based on the information available.
8. Research Methodology/StatisticsThe ability to design, conduct, and analyze the results of research experiments and studies.
9. Ethics/ValuesThe ability to take into consideration the costs, benefits, and impact of projects on the individuals involved and society in general.
10. Technology/ComputerThe ability to use computers for information gathering, analysis and dissemination.

Table 2

Results
Skill Area
Effect
Eta-squared
1. CommunicationF(1,100) = 5.66, p = .019
.05
2. Information GatheringF(1,100) = 20.35, p = .001
.17
3. Groups/OrganizationsF(1,100) = 0.00, p = n.s.
.00
4. InterpersonalF(1,100) = 11.63, p =.001
.10
5. Behavior ManagementF(1,100) = 0.14, p = n.s.
.00
6. Individual DifferencesF(1,100) = 0.16,p = n.s.
.00
7. Critical ThinkingF(1,100) = 13.22, p = .001
.12
8. Research MethodsF(1,100) = 62.21, p = .001
.38
9. Ethics/ValuesF(1,100) = 18.02, p = .001
.15
10. Technology/ComputerF(1,100) = 4.27, p = .041
.04

Table 3

Mean Scores
Skill Area
Freshmen
Seniors
M XX SD
XXMXX SD
1. Communication*3.9XX 1.66 XX 4.74XX1.67
2. Information gathering***4.57X 1.95XX 6.54XX2.07
3. Groups/Organizations 4.70XX2.14XX XX4.65XX2.00
4. Interpersonal***2.78XX1.17XXXX3.78XX1.81
5. Behavior Management3.52XX 2.36XXXX3.37 XX2.05
6. Individual Differences4.50XX1.51 XX4.67XX1.90
7. Critical Thinking***3.37XX1.31 XX4.59XX2.06
8. Research Methods***2.26XX1.77 XX5.74XX2.62
9. Ethics/Values***3.50XX1.81 XX5.22XX2.44
10. Technology/Computer*5.41XX1.45 XX6.02XX1.57

Note. The possible range of mean scores is 0 to 9, 0 indicating
no skill experiences for an area, 9 indicating all possible skill
experiences for an area.
* p < .05, *** p < .001.